Rented normally, it costs you £929 a month. That is £11,148 a year, every year you hold it.

Will it pay?Calculator

The mortgage alone costs more than the whole rent — you top up £929 a month

It is £929 a month short. Borrowing £171,512 less would close that shortfall — which is £171,512 more cash at the start, on top of the deposit.

£2,133 mortgage

£1,755 rent in£929 short

◧ market rent £1,755 · 32 comps2 empty weeks a year assumed

What if I change my assumptions?The dials

At the asking price, 25% deposit, 6.50% charged

Change any of these 16 and every card on this page changes with it. The 6.50% is the 5.75% quoted plus a company premium.

◧ worked out from local rents

What will it cost me to buy?Breakdown

£185,525 + refurb costs

And about £55,741 more over five years, because it loses £929 every month you hold it — before any repair. That already assumes the rent never falls.

£185,525 to buy it

deposit · stamp duty · solicitor · fees~£23,449, unseen

□ works not inspected

What would have to be true?The search

No offer makes this pay

Even at £315,000 — well below the £525,000 asked — the rent still does not cover the costs. The gap is the rent against the running costs, not the price, so negotiating does not close it.

◧ worked back from the rent■ stamp duty re-bandedtested down to £315,000

Is the price right?Comparables

Nothing nearby is comparable — but it is 192% over its 2004 price

The dearest sold for 1.9× the cheapest, so the rent has to justify this price on its own.

you'd pay £525,000

£270,000

£357,500

£390,000

£420,000

£425,000

£440,000

£465,000

£475,000

£475,000

£490,000

£519,000

£525,000

£270k£397.5k£525k

£270,000 cheapest£525,000 dearest

12 completed sales, same property type, last 3 years

□ 12 sold nearby, not matched on sizeHM Land Registry Price Paid Data

What will the rent borrow?Lender test

The rent carries £186,207 of the £393,750 loan

That £207,543 is yours to find on top of the deposit. Tested at 125% instead of 145% — a company or a basic-rate taxpayer usually is — the gap is £177,750. Lenders test the rent at 7.5% and need it to cover 145% of the payment.

£3,568 needed

more than the £1,688 rent

stressed at 7.5%, 145% cover

◧ rent after empty weeks £1,688PRA-style test

Who has to say yes?Council record

Liverpool council decides

Named from the postcode, with no decision record under it. Check Liverpool council's pre-application advice before you commit to a room-let plan.

■ Article 4 — planning permission required◧ authority from the postcode□ no decision recordfrom the Article 4 map we hold

How big is it, really?The plan

One figure, and nothing checking it 1,622 sq ft

Only the agent’s figure exists for this house. Open for what that means.

□ area unchecked — agent’s own

Is it a good location?Open the map

Liverpool, L16 7PA

No schools in this postcode area and flood risk checking… — open for the map, the schools and the rest.

Article 4Planning permission required to let by the room

■ postcode area, not this address

What could kill thisThe checks

The council here has taken away the automatic right to rent this out by the room

You would have to apply for permission first, and the council can say no.

2 problems found · 2 came back clear · 4 we could not check · 1 does not apply to this property

■ from the Article 4 maplisting last seen 16 Sep 2026

Which strategy wins?The ways to run it

Every way loses money — Standard rental loses least, at £929 a month

Let it to the council: £7,008 a year less, but they keep paying when it is empty.

Standard rental−£929 · £208,974 in

Rent by the room−£1,374 · £208,974 in

Guaranteed council rent−£1,513 · £208,974 in

Housing-benefit rent−£1,705 · £208,974 in

Each row: money kept a month, then the cash it ties up. Not compared: Do it up, then remortgage (pays back at the remortgage) · Short-stay let (no local short-let data) · Buy, improve & sell (pays out on sale)

◧ 4 ways, one measureranked on money kept each month, at the asking price

What would you walk away with?The five-year sums

−£81,548 after five years on the cash you put in, before tax on the sale

Less than the same cash would have made in a savings account, after tax on the interest. The savings account’s capital is not at risk; the property’s is. A fall of about 25% in the price would leave nothing from a sale after selling costs, and you would still owe the lender any shortfall. That is the £208,974 you put in. The 5-year fix runs past this 5-year hold, so the rate reset comes after it.

◧ 2.0%/yr growth assumed