Rented normally, it costs you £617 a month. That is £7,402 a year, every year you hold it.

Will it pay?Calculator

The mortgage alone costs more than the whole rent — you top up £617 a month

It is £617 a month short. Borrowing £113,878 less would close that shortfall — which is £113,878 more cash at the start, on top of the deposit.

£1,016 mortgage

£784 rent in£617 short

◧ market rent £784 · 48 comps2 empty weeks a year assumed

What if I change my assumptions?The dials

At the asking price, 25% deposit, 6.50% charged

Change any of these 16 and every card on this page changes with it. The 6.50% is the 5.75% quoted plus a company premium.

◧ worked out from local rents

What will it cost me to buy?Breakdown

£84,400 + refurb costs

And about £37,010 more over five years, because it loses £617 every month you hold it — before any repair. That already assumes the rent never falls.

£84,400 to buy it

deposit · stamp duty · solicitor · fees~£10,764, unseen

□ works not inspected

What would have to be true?The search

No offer makes this pay

Even at £150,000 — well below the £250,000 asked — the rent still does not cover the costs. The gap is the rent against the running costs, not the price, so negotiating does not close it.

◧ worked back from the rent■ stamp duty re-bandedtested down to £150,000

Is the price right?The deeds

Last sold for £149,000 in 2015

Nothing nearby is comparable, but asking is 68% more than the £149,000 paid for it in 2015.

□ this address’s own deeds, no comparable saleHM Land Registry Price Paid Data

What will the rent borrow?Lender test

The rent carries £83,183 of the £187,500 loan

That £104,317 is yours to find on top of the deposit. Tested at 125% instead of 145% — a company or a basic-rate taxpayer usually is — the gap is £91,008. Lenders test the rent at 7.5% and need it to cover 145% of the payment.

£1,699 needed

more than the £754 rent

stressed at 7.5%, 145% cover

◧ rent after empty weeks £754PRA-style test

How big is it, really?The plan

The rooms are on the plan; the total is not

The plan is on file; the floor area is not.

□ no floor area published

Is it a good location?Open the map

Peterborough, PE12 8RW

1 of 4 schools in this postcode area rated Good or Outstanding and flood risk checking… — open for the map, the schools and the rest.

Article 4Not assessed for this address

■ postcode area, not this address

What could kill thisThe checks

The area is mapped as high flood risk

Flood maps cover areas, not buildings — treat it as a reason to search, not a verdict.

2 problems found · 1 came back clear · 3 we could not check · 3 do not apply to this property

■ from the flood maplisting last seen 16 Sep 2026

Which strategy wins?The ways to run it

Every way loses money — Standard rental loses least, at £617 a month

Standard rental also ties up the least cash, £95,164.

Standard rental−£617 · £95,164 in

Housing-benefit rent−£789 · £95,164 in

Each row: money kept a month, then the cash it ties up. Not compared: Rent by the room (only 2 bedrooms) · Do it up, then remortgage (pays back at the remortgage) · Short-stay let (no local short-let data) · Guaranteed council rent (no scheme in this borough) · Buy, improve & sell (pays out on sale)

◧ 2 ways, one measureranked on money kept each month, at the asking price

What would you walk away with?The five-year sums

−£46,104 after five years on the cash you put in, before tax on the sale

Less than the same cash would have made in a savings account, after tax on the interest. The savings account’s capital is not at risk; the property’s is. A fall of about 25% in the price would leave nothing from a sale after selling costs, and you would still owe the lender any shortfall. That is the £95,164 you put in. The 5-year fix runs past this 5-year hold, so the rate reset comes after it.

◧ 2.0%/yr growth assumed