Rented normally, it costs you £695 a month. That is £8,341 a year, every year you hold it.

Will it pay?Calculator

The mortgage alone costs more than the whole rent — you top up £695 a month

It is £695 a month short. Borrowing £128,328 less would close that shortfall — which is £128,328 more cash at the start, on top of the deposit.

£1,320 mortgage

£1,069 rent in£695 short

◧ market rent £1,069 · 7 comps2 empty weeks a year assumed

What if I change my assumptions?The dials

At the asking price, 25% deposit, 6.50% charged

Change any of these 16 and every card on this page changes with it. The 6.50% is the 5.75% quoted plus a company premium.

◧ worked out from local rents

What will it cost me to buy?Breakdown

£111,775 + refurb costs

And about £41,707 more over five years, because it loses £695 every month you hold it — before any repair. That already assumes the rent never falls.

£111,775 to buy it

deposit · stamp duty · solicitor · fees~£1,575, unseen

□ works not inspected

What would have to be true?The search

No offer makes this pay

Even at £195,000 — well below the £325,000 asked — the rent still does not cover the costs. The gap is the rent against the running costs, not the price, so negotiating does not close it.

◧ worked back from the rent■ stamp duty re-bandedtested down to £195,000

Is the price right?The deeds

Last sold for £148,000 in 2004

Nothing nearby is comparable, but asking is 120% more than the £148,000 paid for it in 2004.

□ this address’s own deeds, no comparable saleHM Land Registry Price Paid Data

What will the rent borrow?Lender test

The rent carries £113,422 of the £243,750 loan

That £130,328 is yours to find on top of the deposit. Tested at 125% instead of 145% — a company or a basic-rate taxpayer usually is — the gap is £112,181. Lenders test the rent at 7.5% and need it to cover 145% of the payment.

£2,209 needed

more than the £1,028 rent

stressed at 7.5%, 145% cover

◧ rent after empty weeks £1,028PRA-style test

Who has to say yes?Council record

Bolton council approves 68% — 56% on a cautious reading

A council-wide rate across 66 HMO decisions, not a forecast for this address.

68%

0%50%100%

never approvesalways approves

the band is the cautious reading of the same 66 decisions — as low as 56%

■ Article 4 — planning permission requireddecision record held for this authority

How big is it, really?The plan

Measured off the plan, not by a surveyor 985 sq ft

The area comes off the plan, not a survey. Open for what that means.

□ area off the floorplan — not a survey

Is it a good location?Open the map

Bolton, BL3 1DH

1 of 5 schools in this postcode area rated Good or Outstanding and flood risk checking… — open for the map, the schools and the rest.

Article 4Planning permission required to let by the room

■ postcode area, not this address

What could kill thisThe checks

The council here has taken away the automatic right to rent this out by the room

You would have to apply for permission first, and the council can say no.

2 problems found · 2 came back clear · 4 we could not check · 1 does not apply to this property

■ from the Article 4 maplisting last seen 16 Sep 2026

Which strategy wins?The ways to run it

Short-stay let beats Rent by the room by £472 a month

Your controls are set to Standard rental — £745 a month behind Short-stay let.

Short-stay let+£50 · £113,350 in

6 nearby short-lets within 11.1 km · low confidence

Rent by the room−£422 · £139,350 in

Standard rental−£695 · £113,350 in

Guaranteed council rent−£823 · £113,350 in

Housing-benefit rent−£1,047 · £113,350 in

Each row: money kept a month, then the cash it ties up. Not compared: Do it up, then remortgage (pays back at the remortgage) · Buy, improve & sell (pays out on sale)

◧ 5 ways, one measureranked on money kept each month, at the asking price

What would you walk away with?The five-year sums

−£51,322 after five years on the cash you put in, before tax on the sale

Less than the same cash would have made in a savings account, after tax on the interest. The savings account’s capital is not at risk; the property’s is. A fall of about 23% in the price would leave nothing from a sale after selling costs, and you would still owe the lender any shortfall. That is the £113,350 you put in. The 5-year fix runs past this 5-year hold, so the rate reset comes after it.

◧ 2.0%/yr growth assumed