Rented normally, it costs you £52 a month. That is £627 a year, every year you hold it.

Will it pay?Calculator

You top up £52 a month — the mortgage takes 40p of every pound of rent

Borrowing £9,640 less would close that shortfall — which is £9,640 more cash at the start, on top of the deposit.

£406 mortgage

£613 running

£1,006 rent in£52 short

◧ market rent £1,006 · 146 comps2 empty weeks a year assumed

What if I change my assumptions?The dials

At the asking price, 25% deposit, 6.50% charged

Change any of these 16 and every card on this page changes with it. The 6.50% is the 5.75% quoted plus a company premium.

◧ worked out from local rents

What will it cost me to buy?Breakdown

£34,500 + refurb costs

And about £3,133 more over five years, because it loses £52 every month you hold it — before any repair. That already assumes the rent never falls.

£34,500 to buy it

deposit · stamp duty · solicitor · fees~£6,936, unseen

□ works not inspected

What would have to be true?The working

£10,000 off and it stops losing money

At the asking price you feed it £52 a month. At £87,139 the rent covers everything — leaving stamp duty of £4,357 at that price.

offer £87,139

asked £100,000

◧ worked back from the rent■ stamp duty re-bandedrounded down to £5,000 — the rent it works back from is an estimate

Can we trust the rent?Rent evidence

Nearby lettings back this rent

We hold too few nearby asking rents to cross-check this figure, so nothing here confirms it a second way.

+136 more

our bar: 10 within 500 m

our own middle half£933–£1,085/mo

■ 146 lettings within 500 m□ no nearby asks to cross-checkAdvertised rents, not signed tenancies

What will the rent borrow?Lender test

The rent carries the whole loan — it could fall 30% and still cover it

Your deposit is what limits this one, not the rent. Lenders test the rent at 7.5% and need it to cover 145% of the payment.

£680 needed

of £967 rent

stressed at 7.5%, 145% cover

◧ rent after empty weeks £967PRA-style test

How big is it, really?The plan

The plan and the advert, side by side 309 sq ft

Two figures for this house, and neither is a survey. Open for both.

□ area off the floorplan — not a survey

Is it a good location?Open the map

Manchester, M16 9QN

Flood risk checking… — open for the map, the schools and the rest.

Article 4Planning permission required to let by the room

■ postcode area, not this address

What could kill thisThe checks

£3,178 a year in charges for the building, owed even when nobody is living there

The contract the property is sold under sets these charges, and they can go up over the years.

2 problems found · 3 came back clear · 2 we could not check · 2 do not apply to this property

■ from the listinglisting last seen 15 Sep 2026

Which strategy wins?The ways to run it

Every way loses money — Standard rental loses least, at £52 a month

Let it to the council: £204 a year less, but they keep paying when it is empty.

Standard rental−£52 · £41,436 in

Guaranteed council rent−£69 · £41,436 in

Housing-benefit rent−£293 · £41,436 in

Each row: money kept a month, then the cash it ties up. Not compared: Rent by the room (only 1 bedroom) · Do it up, then remortgage (pays back at the remortgage) · Short-stay let (no local short-let data) · Buy, improve & sell (pays out on sale)

◧ 3 ways, one measureranked on money kept each month, at the asking price

What would you walk away with?The five-year sums

−£7,329 after five years on the cash you put in, before tax on the sale

Less than the same cash would have made in a savings account, after tax on the interest. The savings account’s capital is not at risk; the property’s is. A fall of about 26% in the price would leave nothing from a sale after selling costs, and you would still owe the lender any shortfall. That is the £41,436 you put in. The 5-year fix runs past this 5-year hold, so the rate reset comes after it.

◧ 2.0%/yr growth assumed