Rented normally, it costs you £999 a month. That is £11,990 a year, every year you hold it.

What could kill thisThe checks

An energy rating of F, and we cannot tell you whether you may rent it out

We could not work out which nation’s rules apply, so we cannot say if you may rent it out.

2 problems found · 1 came back clear · 4 we could not check · 2 do not apply to this property

■ from the listinglisting last seen 16 Sep 2026

Will it pay?Calculator

The mortgage alone costs more than the whole rent — you top up £999 a month

It is £999 a month short. Borrowing £191,846 less would close that shortfall — which is £191,846 more cash at the start, on top of the deposit.

£1,758 mortgage

£1,203 rent in£999 short

◧ market rent £1,203 · 30 comps2 empty weeks a year assumed

What if I change my assumptions?The dials

At the asking price, 25% deposit, 6.25% charged

Change any of these 16 and every card on this page changes with it. The 6.25% is the 5.50% quoted plus a company premium.

◧ worked out from local rents

What will it cost me to buy?Breakdown

£157,400 + refurb costs

And about £59,952 more over five years, because it loses £999 every month you hold it — before any repair. That already assumes the rent never falls.

£157,400 to buy it

deposit · stamp duty · solicitor · fees~£1,350, unseen

□ works not inspected

What would have to be true?

We cannot price this without a postcode

Which purchase tax applies — stamp duty, LBTT or land transaction tax — is decided by the nation the address sits in, and this listing carries no postcode to resolve it. Rather than assume England and then price to the pound off it, this card does not answer. The agent can give you the postcode.

□ no postcode on the listing

What will the rent borrow?Lender test

The rent carries £127,639 of the £337,500 loan

That £209,861 is yours to find on top of the deposit. Tested at 125% instead of 145% — a company or a basic-rate taxpayer usually is — the gap is £189,438. Lenders test the rent at 7.5% and need it to cover 145% of the payment.

£3,059 needed

more than the £1,157 rent

stressed at 7.5%, 145% cover

◧ rent after empty weeks £1,157PRA-style test

How big is it, really?The plan

The rooms are on the plan; the total is not

The plan is on file; the floor area is not.

□ no floor area published

Is it a good location?Open the map

York

No schools in this postcode area and flood risk checking… — open for the map, the schools and the rest.

Article 4Not assessed for this address

■ mapped to a point, not an address

Which strategy wins?The ways to run it

Every way loses money — Rent by the room loses least, at £647 a month

Rent by the room needs £26,000 more cash than the others.

Rent by the room−£647 · £184,750 in

Standard rental−£999 · £158,750 in

Housing-benefit rent−£1,362 · £158,750 in

Each row: money kept a month, then the cash it ties up. Not compared: Do it up, then remortgage (pays back at the remortgage) · Short-stay let (no local short-let data) · Guaranteed council rent (no scheme in this borough) · Buy, improve & sell (pays out on sale)

◧ 3 ways, one measureranked on money kept each month, at the asking price

What would you walk away with?The five-year sums

−£75,834 after five years on the cash you put in, before tax on the sale

Less than the same cash would have made in a savings account, after tax on the interest. The savings account’s capital is not at risk; the property’s is. A fall of about 23% in the price would leave nothing from a sale after selling costs, and you would still owe the lender any shortfall. That is the £158,750 you put in. The 5-year fix runs past this 5-year hold, so the rate reset comes after it.

◧ 2.0%/yr growth assumed